Plain language summary
Migraine is a neurological disease characterized by moderate-to-severe headache and accompanying autonomic, affective, and sensory features. It is also comorbid with several diseases, including obesity. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a standardized behavioural weight loss (BWL) intervention on migraine headache frequency. This study is a parallel-group, single-blinded randomised controlled trail. The participants were randomized to one of the two groups: BWL or migraine education (ME). Results show that changes in migraine headache frequency at post-treatment and follow-up were not significantly different between the BWL and ME control interventions. In fact, both BWL and ME had significant reductions in monthly migraine headache days from baseline to post-treatment and follow-up. Authors conclude that further research is required to better understand treatment mechanisms and whether BWL can enhance effects of standard pharmacologic and/or non-pharmacologic migraine therapies in patients with comorbid overweight/obesity.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to test whether behavioral weight loss (BWL) intervention decreases headaches in women with comorbid migraine and overweight or obesity. METHODS This randomized, single-blind trial allocated women 18 to 50 years old with 4 to 20 migraine days per month and a BMI = 25.0-49.9 kg/m2 to 16 weeks of BWL (n = 54), which targeted exercise and eating behaviors for weight loss, or to migraine education control (ME, n = 56), which delivered didactic instruction on migraine and treatments. Participants completed a 4-week smartphone headache diary at baseline, posttreatment (16-20 wk), and follow-up (32-36 wk). The primary outcome was posttreatment change in migraine days per month, analyzed via linear mixed effects models. RESULTS Of 110 participants randomly assigned, 85 (78%) and 80 (73%) completed posttreatment and follow-up. Although the BWL group achieved greater weight loss (mean [95% CI] in kilograms) than the ME group at posttreatment (-3.8 [-2.5 to -5.0] vs. + 0.9 [-0.4 to 2.2], P < 0.001) and follow-up (-3.2 [-2.0 to -4.5] vs. + 1.1 [-0.2 to 2.4], P < 0.001), there were no significant group (BWL vs. ME) differences (mean [95% CI]) in migraine days per month at posttreatment (-3.0 [-2.0 to -4.0] vs. -4.0 [-2.9 to -5.0], P = 0.185) or follow-up (-3.8 [-2.7 to -4.8] vs. -4.4 [-3.4 to -5.5], P = 0.378). CONCLUSIONS Contrary to hypotheses, BWL and ME yielded similar, sustained reductions in migraine headaches. Future research should evaluate whether adding BWL to standard pharmacological and/or nonpharmacological migraine treatment approaches yields greater benefits.
Methodological quality
Jadad score
:
3
Allocation concealment
:
Yes
